Chun-Chien Hou vs Ryota Tanuma Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Aug at 11:10 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Hou vs R. Tanuma

TPE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hou 1 - 0 Tanuma
They have played 3 sets in total, with Chun-Chien Hou winning 2 and Ryota Tanuma winning 1. The last match between Chun-Chien Hou and Ryota Tanuma was at the M15 Wuning, 06-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chun-Chien Hou getting the victory 2-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hou | 1 |
| Tanuma | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Wuning(08-06-25)
C. Hou vs R. Tanuma H2H Profile
C. Hou vs R. Tanuma Match Preview:
- How do Hou and Tanuma's second serve performances compare recently? Hou has been winning 42.06% of points on their second serve, while Tanuma maintains a slightly higher rate at 44.55%.
- In terms of return game effectiveness, Hou captures 25.81% of points on opponents' second serves, whereas Tanuma achieves a much higher 45.08%. However, for first-serve returns, Hou leads slightly with 30.23% to Tanuma's 28.07%.
- Assessing pressure handling, how do they compare in saving breakpoints? Tanuma excels, saving 58.65% of breakpoints compared to Hou's 36.36%.
- Over the past year, Hou and Tanuma exhibit similar win percentages: Hou stands at 58.14% and Tanuma at 57.14%.
- Both players have their best career win percentages on Hard courts, with Hou at 59% and Tanuma closely behind at 58%. Conversely, Hou struggles on indoor hard courts, and Tanuma finds grass less favorable.
- What is the level of competition they've each faced recently? Hou has encountered opponents with an average rank of 125.37, whereas Tanuma's opponents averaged a rank of 303.52, potentially giving Hou an edge in experience against higher-ranked competition.
- In the critical deciding set scenario, both players have a win rate of 50%, indicating no clear advantage.
- Considering breakpoint conversions in recent play, Tanuma has been more efficient, converting 37.5% of his chances to Hou's 23.08%.
Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):
This matchup presents an interesting battle of strengths and weaknesses. Tanuma demonstrates a slight edge in second serve points won and significantly better breakpoint conversion, which could be crucial in pivotal moments.
Despite this, Hou's experience against tougher opponents could prove vital, particularly given Tanuma's history against lower-ranked competition. Hou also has a marginal advantage in first serve return success, which may help mitigate Tanuma's service games.
Under pressure, Tanuma appears more composed with a superior breakpoint saving rate, potentially swaying the outcome during high-stakes moments.
Based on these comparative stats, Tanuma's ability to convert breakpoints and handle pressure suggests he might have the upper hand to emerge victorious in this upcoming encounter.
Chun-Chien Hou vs Ryota Tanuma Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Hou vs R. Tanuma H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:35:13 | Average Match Time | 2:35:13 |
| 44% (40/91) | 1st Serve % | 49% (38/77) |
| 57% (23/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (26/38) |
| 55% (28/51) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (16/39) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (4/10) |
| 45% (35/77) | Return Points Win % | 44% (40/91) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Hou Recent Matches Played
R. Tanuma Recent Matches Played

C. Hou vs R. Tanuma Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.46% (32/29) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.49% (311/230) |
| 53.03% (70/62) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.36% (682/528) |
| 53.22% (662/582) | Games Win/Loss | 53.52% (5856/5085) |
| 56.00% (28/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.46% (228/162) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.20% (68/53) |
| 36.36% (4/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.85% (14/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 42 | Aces Total | 1058 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 36 | Total Double Faults | 941 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:6:43 |
| 161.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 456.74 |
| 50% (567/1132) | 1st Serve % | 61% (14086/23227) |
| 65% (371/567) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (9450/14086) |
| 49% (278/565) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4606/9142) |
| 31% (27/87) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1048/2443) |
| 35% (392/1116) | Return Points Win % | 40% (9514/23541) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 35.48% (11/20) |
| 54.24% (32/27) | Futures W/L | 58.94% (300/209) |
| 52% (31/60) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (306/533) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 47% (7/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (56/114) |
| 36% (4/11) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (68/128) |
| 85% (34/29) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (313/280) |
| 12% (34/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (313/33) |
| 7% (27/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (228/32) |